[Python-Dev] Re: method decorators (PEP 318) (original) (raw)

Samuele Pedroni pedronis at bluewin.ch
Tue Mar 30 10:01:40 EST 2004


At 09:50 30.03.2004 -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:

At 10:38 PM 3/29/04 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:

On 03/29/04 18:51, Greg Ewing wrote:

Shane Hathaway <shane at zope.com>:

That would be nice, but here is what I would like it to mean:

def f(): dosomething() lock(foo)(f) But what about x = 17 with lock(foo): x = 42 print x ? Hmm, yep, that won't work. A pity. It would work if the code in the block was treated as a nested scope but with write access to the immediately surrounding scope. But that's quite a bit of compiler change, I'd imagine. Anyway, this is one of the very few places where I'd actually be in favor of allowing rebinding variables from an enclosing scope.

Umph, that's totally OT wrt 318, and we had this whole discussion at this informal nice-to-have level at the beginning of last year. No point rehashing that at that level of (non-)depth.

If someone want this or something like this, then please write a PEP and preferably an implementation.

Just to recall from the top of my head, open issues are:

regards.



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list