[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 - Relative Imports (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Fri Sep 10 17:04:32 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 - Relative Imports
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 - Relative Imports
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2004-09-10 at 07:46, Jim Fulton wrote:
I find explicit relative imports easier to read, as it reduces the noise level.
I like the fact that local imports look different from non-local ones.
Yes, +1. The most important thing IMO is that there be an explicit way to spell whatever the default isn't. I was just grumbling the other day because I had to rename a submodule foologging.py instead of the more natural logging.py because that module suddenly wanted to start importing the global logging package.
-Barry
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040910/930a82a1/attachment.pgp
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 - Relative Imports
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 328 - Relative Imports
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]