[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0 (original) (raw)

Paolino paolo_veronelli at libero.it
Sat Sep 3 13:31:26 CEST 2005

Martin Blais wrote:

On 9/2/05, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:

At 11:02 AM 9/3/2005 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:

Printing the items in a sequence also becomes straightforward:

print " ".join(map(str, range(10))) => output(*range(10)) Playing well with generator expressions comes for free, too: print " ".join(str(x*x) for x in range(10)) => output((xx for x in range(10))) An implementation issue: that generator expression will get expanded into a tuple, so you shouldn't use that for outputting large sequences. Then how about:: output((xx for x in range(10)), iter=1) Illegal in python2.4.(Wrongly ?) And makes the star solution half unuseful.

def f(*args,**kwargs): ... pass ... f(*(1,2,3),iter=True) File "", line 1 f(*(1,2,3),iter=True)

Leaving out what I just asserted in the previous thread :( I suppose you meant output((x*x for x in range(10)), iter=1)

f(1,[2,3],(_ for _ in (4,5)),iter=True)

Regards Paolino

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list