[Python-Dev] possible memory leak on windows (valgrind report) (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Mon Sep 19 19:05:00 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] possible memory leak on windows (valgrind report)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] possible memory leak on windows (valgrind report)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
So it is. I swear I saw "s"; I must've had an out of date version. The change to "et" is less than a week old, but that's no excuse. :-(
It does look like the patch is correct then (but I can't build on Windows any more either). Sorry for the confusion.
On 9/19/05, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz at gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/19/05, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > That patch doesn't make sense to me -- the "s" code to > PyArgParseTuple doesn't return newly allocated memory, it just > returns a pointer into a string object that is owned by the caller > (really by the call machinery I suppose). Compare other places using > PyArgParseTuple(args, "s:...").
"s"? The format passed to ParseTuple is "et". At least it is in the patch I'm looking at. n
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] possible memory leak on windows (valgrind report)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] possible memory leak on windows (valgrind report)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]