[Python-Dev] Octal literals (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Wed Feb 1 20:51:41 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 11:07 -0800, Josiah Carlson wrote:
In my experience, I've rarely had the opportunity (or misfortune?) to deal with negative constants, whose exact bit representation I needed to get "just right". For my uses, I find that specifying "-0x..." or "-..." to be sufficient.
I can't remember a time when signed hex, oct, or binary representation wasn't a major inconvenience, let alone something desirable. Don't get me started about hex(id(object()))! I typically use hex for addresses and bit fields, binary for bit flags and other bit twiddling, and oct for OS/file system interfaces. In none of those cases do you actually need or want signed values. IME.
-Barry
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060201/e9b3cc4a/attachment.pgp
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]