[Python-Dev] any support for a methodcaller HOF? (original) (raw)
Alex Martelli aleaxit at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 16:00:26 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] any support for a methodcaller HOF?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] any support for a methodcaller HOF?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 3, 2006, at 6:47 AM, Giovanni Bajo wrote: ...
use itemgetter and friends but the "correct" way of doing a defferred "x[1]" should let you write "x[1]" in the code. This is my main opposition to partial/itemgetter/attrgetter/methodcaller: they allow deferred execution using a syntax which is not equivalent to that of immediate execution.
I understand your worry re the syntax issue. So what about Michael
Hudson's "placeholder class" idea, where X[1] returns the callable
that will do x[1] when called, etc? Looks elegant to me...
Alex
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] any support for a methodcaller HOF?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] any support for a methodcaller HOF?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]