[Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator (original) (raw)
Duncan Booth duncan.booth at suttoncourtenay.org.uk
Sat Feb 4 18:26:12 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne at gmail.com> wrote in news:740c3aec0602040816w34981344n271b237d6b6c9fd5 at mail.gmail.com:
On 2/4/06, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
I won't even look at the PEP as long as it uses / or // (or any other operator) for concatenation. That's good, because it doesn't. :) http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0355.html No, but it does say that / may be reintroduced 'if the BFDL so desires'. I hope that doesn't mean the BDFL may be overruled. :^)
I'm not convinced by the rationale given why atime,ctime,mtime and size are methods rather than properties but I do find this PEP much more agreeable than the last time I looked at it.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP and the division operator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]