[Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Feb 5 13:57:41 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
- ctime() is documented to be unportable: it has different semantics on UNIX and Windows. I believe the class should abstract from these details.
Note that this is the opposite of normal Python policy: Python does not attempt to create cross-platform abstractions, but instead chooses to expose platform differences. The Path class shouldn't abstract this any more than the original *path modules do.
I think this is partially due to a misunderstanding, both by Microsoft, and in Python. There is a long-time myth that ctime denotes "creation time", as this is really in-line with mtime and atime.
I think the path module should provide these under a different name: creation_time and status_change_time. Either of these might be absent. ctime should be provided to report whatever ctime used to report in the past (i.e. creation_time on Windows, status_change_time on Unix).
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]