[Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Feb 5 18:04:06 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
ctime should be provided to report whatever ctime used to report in the past (i.e. creationtime on Windows, statuschangetime on Unix).
In other words, if there are mistakes in the old API, this is the time to fix them. Why should we carry them over to a new API?
I'm not talking about all API in general, I'm talking about ctime specifically. People will ask "where is ctime?", and it better be where they think it should be. I don't see a point in confusing users.
(Plus, there might be systems that associate yet a different meaning with ctime - it is just our guess that it means "status change time").
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Path PEP: some comments
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]