[Python-Dev] Octal literals (original) (raw)
Bengt Richter bokr at oz.net
Mon Feb 6 15:27:12 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:05:01 +0100, Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:33:57AM +0000, Bengt Richter wrote:
Perhaps I missed a py3k assumption in this thread (where I see in the PEP that "Remove distinction between int and long types" is core item number one)? http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0237.html -- an ungoing process, not a Py3K-eventual one. Thanks, I noticed. Hence my question following what you quote: """ Is PEP 237 phase C to be implemented sooner than py3k, making isinstance(, int) a transparently distinction-hiding alias for isinstance(, integer), or outright illegal? IOW, will isinstance(, int) be guaranteed to be a bug, thus requiring code change? If so, when? """ Sorry that my paragraph-packing habit tends to bury things. I'll have to work on that ;-/
Regards, Bengt Richter
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Octal literals
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]