[Python-Dev] Let's just keep lambda (original) (raw)
Patrick Collison patrick at collison.ie
Wed Feb 8 11:13:25 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Old Style Classes Goiung in Py3K
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
After so many attempts to come up with an alternative for lambda, perhaps we should admit defeat. I've not had the time to follow the most recent rounds, but I propose that we keep lambda, so as to stop wasting everybody's talent and time on an impossible quest. I agree with this. The name "lambda" is a wart, even if the deferred expression feature isn't. My preference is to simply replace the keyword lambda with a keyword "expr" (or if that's not acceptable because there's too much prior use of expr as a variable name, then maybe "expression" - but that's starting to get a bit long).
Sorry, I'm a little late to this discussion.
How about procedure', or just
proc'?
And to think that people thought that keeping "lambda", but changing
the name, would avoid all the heated discussion... :-)
-Patrick
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Old Style Classes Goiung in Py3K
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]