[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?] (original) (raw)
Michael Foord fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk
Tue Feb 14 00:40:16 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Phillip J. Eby wrote: [snip..]
In fact, the 'encoding' argument seems useless in the case of str objects, and it seems it should default to latin-1 for unicode objects. The only -1 for having an implicit encode that behaves differently to other implicit encodes/decodes that happen in Python. Life is confusing enough already.
Michael Foord
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]