[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?] (original) (raw)

James Y Knight foom at fuhm.net
Tue Feb 14 01:49:55 CET 2006


On Feb 13, 2006, at 7:09 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

On 2/13/06, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:

Sorry - I meant for the unicode to bytes case. A default encoding that behaves differently to the current to implicit encodes/decodes would be confusing IMHO. And I am in agreement with you there (I think only Phillip argued otherwise).

I agree that string to bytes shouldn't change the value of the bytes. It's a deal then. Can the owner of PEP 332 update the PEP to record these decisions?

So, in python2.X, you have:

In py3k, when the str object is eliminated, then what do you have?
Perhaps

James



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list