[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?] (original) (raw)
Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Tue Feb 14 14:03:39 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> writes:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
There's also the consideration for APIs that, informally, accept either a string or a sequence of objects. My preference these days is not to design APIs that way. It's never necessary and it avoids a lot of problems.
Oh yes.
Cheers, mwh
-- ZAPHOD: Listen three eyes, don't try to outweird me, I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal. -- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 7
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]