[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?] (original) (raw)
Aahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Thu Feb 16 05:20:31 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006, Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 15, 2006, at 6:35 PM, Aahz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Anyway, I'm now convinced that bytes should act as an array of ints, where the ints are restricted to range(0, 256) but have type int. range(0, 255)? No, Guido was correct. range(0, 256) is [0, 1, 2, ..., 255].
My mistake -- I wasn't thinking of the literal Python function.
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]