[Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods (original) (raw)
Bernhard Herzog bh at intevation.de
Thu Feb 16 20:59:10 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Travis E. Oliphant" <oliphant.travis at ieee.org> writes:
2) The index special method will have the signature
def index(self): return obj Where obj must be either an int or a long or another object that has the index special method (but not self).
So int objects will not have an index method (assuming that ints won't return a different but equal int object). However:
4) A new operator.index(obj) function will be added that calls equivalent of obj.index() and raises an error if obj does not implement the special method.
So operator.index(1) will raise an exception. I would expect operator.index to be implemented using PyNumber_index.
Bernhard
-- Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/ Skencil http://skencil.org/ Thuban http://thuban.intevation.org/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Please comment on PEP 357 -- adding nb_index slot to PyNumberMethods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]