[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict (original) (raw)
Thomas Wouters thomas at xs4all.net
Thu Feb 16 22:21:33 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 01:11:49PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Over lunch with Alex Martelli, he proposed that a subclass of dict with this behavior (but implemented in C) would be a good addition to the language. It looks like it wouldn't be hard to implement. It could be a builtin named defaultdict. The first, required, argument to the constructor should be the default value. Remaining arguments (even keyword args) are passed unchanged to the dict constructor.
Should a dict subclass really change the constructor/initializer signature in an incompatible way?
-- Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]