[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sat Feb 18 01:20:46 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/17/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
That's why I think haskey and in should return True for any key. This leaves keys(), items(), and values(). From a pure point of view, they should return infinite sets. Practicality beats purity, so yes, d[k] could be considered a modifying operation.
I think practicality beats purity even for has_key/in; IMO these operations are more useful when they match keys() instead of always returning True. But someone should start writing some code to play with this.
I have a working patch (including a hack for PyDict_GetItem()): python.org/sf/1433928
So there's no excuse to be practical now.
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]