[Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 13:01:02 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] documenting things [Was: Re: Proposal: defaultdict]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2/19/06, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote:
> You are missing the rationale of the PEP process. The point is > not documentation. The point of the PEP process is to channel > and collect discussion, so that the BDFL can make a decision. > The BDFL is not bound at all to the PEP process. > > To document things, we use (or should use) documentation. > > One could wish this ideal had been the case for the import extensions defined in PEP 302.
(A bit off-topic, but that hit home, so I'll reply...)
Agreed, and it's my fault they weren't, to some extent. I did try to find a suitable place, but the import docs are generally fairly scattered, and there wasn't a particularly good place to put the changes.
Any suggestions would be gratefully accepted... Paul.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: defaultdict
- Next message: [Python-Dev] documenting things [Was: Re: Proposal: defaultdict]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]