[Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?) (original) (raw)
Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Wed Jul 5 17:57:03 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 05:40 AM 7/5/2006 -0400, Scott Dial wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote: > Would this also use ..num to refer to num in an outer scope two levels removed?
I realize this was a wink, but it is a valid problem with the "dot"-proposal.
Actually, it isn't. :) See below.
def foo(n): def bar(n): def baz(): return .n
So, which 'n' outer 'n' is being referenced?
Notice that this is a made-up example. Existing Python scoping rules don't allow this! Thus your example is not a bug, it's a feature request. And I say we say "no" to adding this feature. ;-)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]