[Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?) (original) (raw)
Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Thu Jul 6 14:39:32 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Chermside <mcherm at mcherm.com> writes:
Phillip Eby writes:
I don't see a problem with requiring '.x' to be used for both reading and writing of outer-scope names; it just shouldn't be required for an outer-scope name that you don't rebind in the current scope.
def counter(num): def inc(): .num += 1 return .num return inc I am reminded of Tim Peter's declaration in response to a similar proposal some time ago: Syntax should not look like grit on my monitor. (Sorry, no reference... but I swear it's word-for-word accurate because the quote burned itself into my memory.)
I think it was Anthony:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-July/054581.html
Cheers, mwh
-- SCSI is not magic. There are fundamental technical reasons why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. -- John Woods
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Explicit Lexical Scoping (pre-PEP?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]