[Python-Dev] Internal namespace proposal (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Jul 27 09:14:27 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal namespace proposal
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal namespace proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Hopwood wrote:
A restricted interpreter refuses access to any object attribute or method with a name beginning with '' (by throwing a new exception type 'InternalAccessException'), unless the access is from a method and its static target is that method's first argument variable.
What's to stop
def my_naughty_method(self): self = some_protected_object self._a_special_attribute = some_naughty_value
init is an internal method. This is as it should be, because it should not be possible to call init on an existing object; only to have init implicitly called when a new object is constructed.
What about calling an inherited init method? Your proposed rule would seem to disallow
BaseClass.init(self, ...)
-- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal namespace proposal
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal namespace proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]