[Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks (original) (raw)

M.-A. Lemburg mal at egenix.com
Thu Jun 8 13:32:24 CEST 2006

Fredrik Lundh wrote:

M.-A. Lemburg wrote:

I put the headings for the timeit.py output on the wrong blocks. Thanks for pointing this out. so how do you explain the Try/Except results, where timeit and pybench seems to agree?

The pybench results match those of timeit.py on my test machine in both cases. I just mixed up the headers when I wrote the email.

Here's the console print-out:

Tools/pybench> ~/projects/Python/Installation/bin/python Calls.py 10 loops, best of 3: 21.8 msec per loop Tools/pybench> ~/projects/Python/Installation/bin/python Exceptions.py 100 loops, best of 3: 15.4 msec per loop

Tools/pybench> ~/projects/Python/Installation/bin/python Python 2.5a2 (trunk, Jun 8 2006, 01:51:06) [GCC 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)] on linux2

Tools/pybench> python Calls.py 100 loops, best of 3: 18.2 msec per loop Tools/pybench> python Exceptions.py 100 loops, best of 3: 17 msec per loop

Tools/pybench> python Python 2.4.2 (#1, Oct 1 2005, 15:24:35) [GCC 3.3.4 (pre 3.3.5 20040809)] on linux2

Calls.py is using timit.py against the PythonFunctionCalls test and Exceptions.py the TryRaiseExcept test.

Function calls are slower in 2.5, while try-except in 2.5 is faster than 2.4.

I've attached the Calls.py file below.

-- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jun 08 2006)

Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/

2006-07-03: EuroPython 2006, CERN, Switzerland 24 days left

::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! :::: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Calls.py Url: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060608/dda00a33/attachment.pot

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list