[Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks (original) (raw)
M.-A. Lemburg mal at egenix.com
Thu Jun 8 14:15:35 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
The pybench results match those of timeit.py on my test machine in both cases. I just mixed up the headers when I wrote the email. on a line by line basis ?
No idea what you mean ? I posted the corrected version after Nick told me about the apparent mistake.
Testnames minimum run-time average run-time this other diff this other diff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PythonFunctionCalls: 130ms 108ms +21.3% 132ms 109ms +20.9% TryRaiseExcept: 115ms 137ms -16.2% 129ms 140ms -7.6%
(this=Python 2.5; other=Python2.4)
timeit.py results (see my last email), converted to the pybench output:
PythonFunctionCalls: 21.8ms 18.2ms +19.8%
TryRaiseExcept: 15.4ms 17.0ms -9.4%
The timeit.py results for TryRaiseExcept on Python 2.4 vary between 17.0 - 18.1ms. With Python 2.5 this doesn't happen.
-- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jun 08 2006)
Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
2006-07-03: EuroPython 2006, CERN, Switzerland 24 days left
::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Benchmarks
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]