[Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative? (original) (raw)
Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Thu Jun 22 21:16:30 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
--- Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote: > http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/ports.html says: > > The PyRangeNew() function was removed. It was never documented, never used > in the core code, and had dangerously lax error checking. > > I use this function (don't remember how I found it; this was years ago), > therefore my code doesn't compile with 2.5b1 (it did OK before with 2.5a2). Is > there an alternative spelling for PyRangeNew()?
You can call PyRangeType with the appropriate parameters. Thanks a lot for the hint! However, I cannot find any documentation for PyRange*. I tried this page... http://docs.python.org/api/genindex.html and google. Did I miss something? I am sure I can get this to work with some digging, but I am posting here to highlight a communication problem. I feel if a function is removed the alternative should be made obvious in the associated documentation; in particular if there is no existing documentation for the alternative.
Well, PyRange_New was undocumented, so there's no place in the documentation where it would have been.
However, it would perhaps be helpful to add a note to the whatsnew document for users like yourself. Andrew, does that make sense?
Georg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyRange_New() alternative?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]