[Python-Dev] Bug in from future processing? (original) (raw)
Tim Peters tim.peters at gmail.com
Sat Mar 4 05:34:55 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Tim]
Doesn't look like Guido responded, so I'll channel him and declare that he intended to agree with me after all ;-)
[Guido]
It was so obvious that you were right I didn't bother to agree at the time. But yes, I agree.
Of course you do. It was obvious to you, and therefore-- as your professional channeler --it was also obvious to me. For some inscrutable reason, though, others tend to imagine looming disasters in silence, instead of just plucking your comforting thoughts from the aether ;-)
And I swear on a stack of Python 1.5.2 language reference manuals that you didn't have to twist my arm. :-)
Indeed! But whose arm could we twist to get them to repair the compiler in 2.4? I'd settle for a blurb in the next 2.4 NEWS just noting that 2.5 will follow the documented syntax. That may even be desirable, to avoid breaking working (albeit by accident) code across a micro release.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]