[Python-Dev] decorator module patch (original) (raw)
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at verizon.net
Sun Mar 12 23:03:58 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] decorator module patch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] decorator module patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Nick Coghlan]
I agree it makes sense to have "decorator", "memoize", "deprecated" and "partial" all being members of the same module, whether the name be "functools" or "functional" (although I have a slight preference for "functools" due to the parallel with "itertools").
I like "functools" for a different reason -- the name is sufficiently broad so that we don't have fret about whether a particular tool fits within the module's scope. In contrast, a name like "functional" suggests that some of these tools don't quite fit.
Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] decorator module patch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] decorator module patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]