[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5? (original) (raw)
Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Wed Mar 29 01:24:49 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 04:22 PM 3/28/2006 -0500, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:48:36 -0500, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: >On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 01:51 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: >> I'm happy to work with Gerhard to make this happen. Does it need a >> PEP? I'd say "no", > >Agreed. pysqlite is solid and widely accepted, and AFAIK has no >competition.
That implementation doesn't support the DBAPI, although it sounds as though the differences are mostly shallow and easy to add implementations for. (e.g., implementing the fetch* methods, a description property, etc.).
More likely to be an issue is that the author hasn't volunteered to contribute/support it.
On the plus side, it sounds like ASPW is a more general wrapping of SQLite, which seems to me to lean in its favor for the stdlib, if it can also be brought into DBAPI compliance.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]