[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5? (original) (raw)

Gerhard Häring gh at ghaering.de
Wed Mar 29 15:35:48 CEST 2006

Barry Warsaw wrote:

On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:47 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote:

My only concern about this is that it wouldn't be possible for other authors to provide 3rd party packages as (for instance) db.mysqldb because of the way package importing works. And I'd prefer 'database.sqlite' rather than 'db.sqlite'. +1 on 'database' as the top-level package name.

I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in the standard library.

+1 on db.sqlite from me.

db.sql.sqlite is another possibility, if adding something like Durus or ZODB in the same top-level namespace could be considered for 2.6.

-- Gerhard

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list