[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5? (original) (raw)
Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Wed Mar 29 20:06:11 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill Janssen wrote:
I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in the standard library. Which doesn't make it a good idea. +1 on adding longer top-level package names as aliases for existing shorter top-level package names.
Which existing short names do you have in mind? os? xml? email? Let's not get excited over names here.
I say: let the RM or the BDFL, whoever feels responsible to pronounce whether PySQLite actually gets in, decide which name it will have.
Georg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]