[Python-Dev] INPLACE_ADD and INPLACE_MULTIPLY oddities in ceval.c (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Mar 30 02:00:46 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] INPLACE_ADD and INPLACE_MULTIPLY oddities in ceval.c
- Next message: [Python-Dev] INPLACE_ADD and INPLACE_MULTIPLY oddities in ceval.c
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Hochberg wrote:
Still, perhaps for Py3K it's worth considering if PyNumberInplaceAdd should only call iadd and add, not radd. Thus giving the target object complete control during inplace adds.
That's probably reasonable, although it would break the conceptual notion that a += b is equivalent to a = a + b when a can't be modified in-place.
Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] INPLACE_ADD and INPLACE_MULTIPLY oddities in ceval.c
- Next message: [Python-Dev] INPLACE_ADD and INPLACE_MULTIPLY oddities in ceval.c
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]