[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5? (original) (raw)
Anthony Baxter anthony at interlink.com.au
Thu Mar 30 05:08:47 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday 30 March 2006 12:07, skip at pobox.com wrote:
To many people "SQL" in the name implies "big databases". I know from personal experience at work. The powers-that-be didn't want to support another database server (we already have Sybase) and didn't want our group's experimental data "polluting" the production database, so the folks who wanted it went the SQLite/pysqlite route. They were immediately bitten by the multiple reader/single writer limitation and they tried to cram too much data into it, so performance further sucked.
And people trying to build production systems on SimpleHTTPServer, SimpleXMLRPCServer, smptd, or dumbdbm will also find their performance sucks. What's your point?
Anthony
-- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]