[Python-Dev] I'm not getting email from SF when assignedabug/patch (original) (raw)
Neal Norwitz nnorwitz at gmail.com
Thu Mar 30 09:33:22 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] I'm not getting email from SF when assignedabug/patch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] I'm not getting email from SF whenassignedabug/patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/29/06, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
I'll just point out that Atlassian has offered us free hosting for a Jira/Confluence solution (plus svn and other stuff we may or may not want). I personally support this option, but I know (and accept!) that there are differing opinions.
I'm in favor of having Atlassian setup a system to be used for 3k. It would be completely experimental and could be completely thrown away which should be made clear to Atlassian if we were to do this. I would use the system for evaluation. If we did this, we should also try to ensure we can get all the data out, just in case we want to preserve any of it.
Most of my time will probably be spent cleaning up 2.5 for the next couple of weeks at least. So I'm not going to have time to rip out more stuff from 3k. coerce is almost gone.
Low hanging fruit for someone interested in helping out:
- find warnings with icc that are important to fix
- remove unnecessary casts for PyMethodDefs
The first item requires icc obviously. I haven't had time to set up my version yet. The second item could be done by anyone. There may be some issues resulting from the ssize_t merge that are being masked due to casting. If we remove the unnecessary casts (e.g., PyCFunction, unaryfunc, binaryfunc, ternaryfunc), we may find some things to cleanup.
We still need builbots for: FreeBSD, AIX, HP-UX, and NetBSD.
n
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] I'm not getting email from SF when assignedabug/patch
- Next message: [Python-Dev] I'm not getting email from SF whenassignedabug/patch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]