[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5? (original) (raw)
Fredrik Lundh fredrik at pythonware.com
Thu Mar 30 09:39:52 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Ewing wrote:
Firebird could be a solution to this. It can be used in a mode that doesn't need a server, and it has no trouble at all with concurrency or large amounts of data that I know of.
so a library that doesn't support multiple independent readers/writers on a single file at all is much better than one that does, at least if the latter immediately reports conflicts if you use a zero second timeout ?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]