[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5? (original) (raw)
Georg Brandl g.brandl at gmx.net
Thu Mar 30 19:44:55 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Anthony Baxter wrote:
On Friday 31 March 2006 02:04, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite', instead. Anything, but please no "db" or "database" top-level module or package :-)
How about "sql"? I can't think of a better name right now - can anyone else, or should it just go in the top level as 'sqlite'? I think sqlite is just fine.
sqlite is problematic since the old PySQLite 1.0 (2.x wrapper) had this name. But I'm in favour of a flat name too -- let's use "sqlite3".
Georg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]