[Python-Dev] New Super PEP (original) (raw)
Collin Winter collinw at gmail.com
Sun Apr 29 20:48:15 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] New Super PEP
- Next message: [Python-Dev] New Super PEP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 4/29/07, Calvin Spealman <ironfroggy at gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/29/07, Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/29/07, Calvin Spealman <ironfroggy at gmail.com> wrote: > [snip] > > I still wasn't really aware of any alternative suggestions that need > > to be included in this. > > Here are two off the top of my head: > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-April/006805.html > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-April/006811.html > > More generally, you're ignoring all the proposals along the line of > "let's fix the super type without making it a keyword". > > Collin Winter >
I'll add both of these, but neither had much support in the original thread. Also, I don't see that I'm ignoring anything along the line of "let's fix the super type without making it a keyword", because I am not advocating it become an actual keyword.
Sorry, I was thrown off by the original title of your PEP.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] New Super PEP
- Next message: [Python-Dev] New Super PEP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]