[Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k? (original) (raw)
Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Sat Nov 24 23:19:19 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote in message news:ca471dc20711240956l28254408v51f404e181ab064a at mail.gmail.com... | Also, there was discussion of this before: | http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050625.html | -- why didn't we decide to do it then?
- Nobody ran with it.
- There was mild concern with breaking 2.x code.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]