[Python-Dev] Problems with the new super() (original) (raw)
Facundo Batista facundobatista at gmail.com
Thu May 1 21:38:56 CEST 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Problems with the new super()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Problems with the new super()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2008/5/1, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net>:
There may be more implications and surprising behavior surrounding this.
I know that the implementation is a compromise, but I'd rather see a super() whose full semantics can be explained to programmers without using to "cell variable", "flocalsplus" and "symtable".
In consideration of what's been said about super() in the past, and what is handled here regarding its Py3 implementation, I want to make a step back, and ask:
Has super() proved more useful than harmful? Which is the value for Py3 to keep it?
Regards,
-- . Facundo
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Problems with the new super()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Problems with the new super()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]