[Python-Dev] PyDict_SetItem hook (original) (raw)
Thomas Wouters thomas at python.org
Thu Apr 2 20:41:07 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyDict_SetItem hook
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyDict_SetItem hook
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 04:16, John Ehresman <jpe at wingware.com> wrote:
Collin Winter wrote:
Have you measured the impact on performance?
I've tried to test using pystone, but am seeing more differences between runs than there is between python w/ the patch and w/o when there is no hook installed. The highest pystone is actually from the binary w/ the patch, which I don't really believe unless it's some low level code generation affect. The cost is one test of a global variable and then a switch to the branch that doesn't call the hooks. I'd be happy to try to come up with better numbers next week after I get home from pycon.
Pystone is pretty much a useless benchmark. If it measures anything, it's the speed of the bytecode dispatcher (and it doesn't measure it particularly well.) PyBench isn't any better, in my experience. Collin has collected a set of reasonable benchmarks for Unladen Swallow, but they still leave a lot to be desired. From the discussions at the VM and Language summits before PyCon, I don't think anyone else has better benchmarks, though, so I would suggest using Unladen Swallow's: http://code.google.com/p/unladen-swallow/wiki/Benchmarks
-- Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090402/23b4c5c3/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyDict_SetItem hook
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyDict_SetItem hook
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]