[Python-Dev] Rethinking intern() and its data structure (original) (raw)
P.J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Apr 10 21:05:17 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Rethinking intern() and its data structure
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Rethinking intern() and its data structure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 06:52 PM 4/10/2009 +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
This problem (slow application startup times due to too many imports at startup, which can in turn can be due to top level imports for library or framework functionality that a given application doesn't actually use) is actually the main reason I sometimes wish for a nice, solid lazy module import mechanism that manages to avoid the potential deadlock problems created by using import statements inside functions.
Have you tried http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Importing ? Or more specifically, http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/Importing#lazy-imports ?
It does of course use the import lock, but as long as your top-level module code doesn't acquire locks (directly or indirectly), it shouldn't be possible to deadlock. (Or more precisely, to add any new deadlocks that you didn't already have.)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Rethinking intern() and its data structure
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Rethinking intern() and its data structure
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]