[Python-Dev] Missing operator.call (original) (raw)
Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Fri Feb 6 10:15:33 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Missing operator.call
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Missing operator.call
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Ewing writes:
The fact that yielding is going on is not of interest in that situation -- it's just an implementation detail. What you really want to express is calling another function, but without losing your status of coroutine-ness.
But doesn't "yield" in the sense of "yield the right of way" mean exactly that? Or am I not understanding what you mean by retain status as a coreoutine?
I don't know if this is an argument for or against using "yield" in this context.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Missing operator.call
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Missing operator.call
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]