[Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex? (original) (raw)
Eric Smith eric at trueblade.com
Thu Oct 15 16:35:30 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
skip at pobox.com wrote:
Eric> I haven't tested it, but I still see WITHOUTCOMPLEX in trunk and py3k Eric> branches. In py3k, it's referenced in: ...
Sure, but is it ever exercised? A name like WITHOUTCOMPLEX suggests that it should be flipped on/off by configure using --without-complex, but that script doesn't know about it and it's not mentioned in pyconfig.h.in, where the various --with-* flags work their magic.
Ah, I misunderstood. I thought you were asking "does setting WITHOUT_COMPLEX work?"
No idea about any configure option, sorry.
Eric.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Can 3.1 still be built without complex?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]