[Python-Dev] One obvious way to do interning [Was: Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set without removing it] (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 22:50:56 CET 2009
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] One obvious way to do interning [Was: Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set without removing it]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Set methods for mapping views
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote:
I had exactly the same idea, but did not post because it violates the general rule that mutators return None.
Is there such a rule? What about set/dict pop? The rule perhaps should be restated as 'Collection mutators return None or possible an item but not the collection.'
And to clarify the rationale for that guideline: it is to make it clear that the mutator is changing the container in place and not creating a new container object.
myset.pop() # No new container, returns popped object mylist.sort() # No new container, returns None sorted(mylist) # New container, so return it mystr.lower() # Creates new string, so return it
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] One obvious way to do interning [Was: Retrieve an arbitrary element from a set without removing it]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Set methods for mapping views
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]