[Python-Dev] Automatic installer builds (was Re: Fwd: Broken link to download (Mac OS X)) (original) (raw)
skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Wed Apr 14 20:54:22 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Automatic installer builds (was Re: Fwd: Broken link to download (Mac OS X))
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Automatic installer builds (was Re: Fwd: Broken link to download (Mac OS X))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bill> In any case, they shouldn't be needed on buildbots maintained by
Bill> the PSF.
Sure. My question was related to humans building binary distributions though. Unless that becomes fully automated so the release manager can just push a button and have it built on and as-yet-nonexistent Mac OSX buildbot machine, somebody will have to generate that installer. Ronald says Fink, MacPorts and /usr/local are poison. If that's truly the case that's fine. It's just that it reduces the size of the potential binary installer build machines.
Now that I think about it, it might not be sufficient to just hide those directories from the environment. The Python setup.py file has unconditional hard-coded references to /sw, /opt/local and /usr/local. That would probably have to change before you could use an "infected" machine to build the binary installer. (At the very least, searching /sw/include (for instance) could be suppressed if /sw/bin was not found in PATH. Similarly for /opt/local and /usr/local.)
(ISTM the same might be true should people ever decide to once again build a Solaris installer. /opt/sfw is currently searched for Berkeley DB include files.)
Skip
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Automatic installer builds (was Re: Fwd: Broken link to download (Mac OS X))
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Automatic installer builds (was Re: Fwd: Broken link to download (Mac OS X))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]