[Python-Dev] patch for review: import documentation (original) (raw)
Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Thu Apr 15 20:55:10 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] patch for review: __import__ documentation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] patch for review: __import__ documentation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yes, we have different opinions. My personal take is to wait a week before you email python-dev if there has been no activity. That is enough time for people interested in the patch to get to it as we all have different schedules. Any faster and it feels like noise on the list to me.
Brett (from his phone)
On Apr 14, 2010 11:28 PM, "Glyph Lefkowitz" <glyph at twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
I see the confusion. I think Martin meant more about open issues that required discussion, not sim... Ach. I hit 'send' too soon. I also wanted to say: it seemed quite clear to me that Martin specifically meant "simply issues that had a patch ready to go". Quoting him exactly:
Please understand that setting the state of an issue to "review" may not be the best way to trigger a review - it may be more effective to post to python-dev if you truly believe that the patch can be committed as-is.
It seems that perhaps the core developers have slightly different opinions about this? :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20100415/28176ab4/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] patch for review: __import__ documentation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] patch for review: __import__ documentation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]