[Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted (original) (raw)

Tarek Ziadé ziade.tarek at gmail.com
Thu Dec 2 22:11:20 CET 2010

2010/12/2 "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de>:

Am 02.12.2010 21:48, schrieb Tarek Ziadé:

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:24 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:

Since discussion has trailed off without any blocking objections, I'm accepting PEP 384. Martin, you may mark the PEP accepted and proceed with merging the implementation for the beta on Saturday.

Thanks! will do (I'll also take into consideration the proposed changes). I did not get an answer to my last mail about distutils / distutils2 What was the question again, and whom did you want an answer from?

You can read it in the archives here: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-November/106138.html

tldr:

The question was "Why not implementing this in Distutils2 ?" Your answer was "No, PEP 3149 was accepted, I will do this in Distutils1" My answer was "Having an accepted PEP does not imply your code lands in the sdtlib (like PEP 376 and 345)"

So the question still stands: "Why not implementing this in Distutils2 ?"

Regards Tarek

Regards, Martin

-- Tarek Ziadé | http://ziade.org

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list