[Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted (original) (raw)
Éric Araujo merwok at netwok.org
Fri Dec 3 03:14:21 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
even without having any changes in distutils it would make sense to know if an extension can be built with the restricted ABI, so maybe it is better to defer any changes to the extension soname, and provide a check for an extension if it conforms to the restricted ABI, even if the extension still uses the python version specific soname.
Python’s setup.py has an example in Martin’s branch:
ext = Extension('xxlimited', ['xxlimited.c'], define_macros=[('Py_LIMITED_API', 1)])
<http://codereview.appspot.com/3262043/patch/1/68>
This is possible with today’s distutils. I don’t know if it’s enough to build stable-ABI-conformant extension modules.
Regards
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 384 accepted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]