[Python-Dev] The fate of transform() and untransform() methods (original) (raw)
Alexander Belopolsky alexander.belopolsky at gmail.com
Thu Dec 9 18:06:46 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The fate of transform() and untransform() methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The fate of transform() and untransform() methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:03 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <mal at egenix.com> wrote:
Alexander Belopolsky wrote: ..
The ticket that introduced the change is currently closed [3] even though the last message suggests that at least part of the change needs to be reverted. That's for Guido to decide. The decision will probably rest with the release manager, but Guido has clearly voiced his opinion. Note that I deliberately removed the codecs part form the subject, so that we can focus on the fate of {str,bytes,bytearray}.{transform,untransform} methods. I don't see any dispute about the fact that adding these methods breaks the moratorium or any suggestion that a case-by-case exception has been approved for this particular case. I don't think there is an option to keep these methods. The two available options are:
- Revert r86934.
- Revert C code changes, but keep the codecs and remove references to transform/untransform from documentation.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The fate of transform() and untransform() methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The fate of transform() and untransform() methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]