[Python-Dev] futures API (original) (raw)
Thomas Nagy tnagyemail-mail at yahoo.fr
Fri Dec 10 19:51:11 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] futures API
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--- El vie, 10/12/10, Brian Quinlan escribió:
On Dec 10, 2010, at 5:36 AM, Thomas Nagy wrote: > I have a process running for a long time, and which may use futures of different maxworkers count. I think it is not too far-fetched to create a new futures object each time. Yet, the execution becomes slower after each call, for example with http://freehackers.org/~tnagy/futurestest.py: > > """ > import concurrent.futures > from queue import Queue > import datetime > > class counter(object): > def init(self, fut): > self.fut = fut > > def run(self): > def lookbusy(num, obj): > tot = 0 > for x in range(num): > tot += x > obj.outq.put(tot) > > start = datetime.datetime.utcnow() > self.count = 0 > self.outq = Queue(0) > for x in range(1000): > self.count += 1 > self.fut.submit(lookbusy, self.count, self) > > while self.count: > self.count -= 1 > self.outq.get() > > delta = datetime.datetime.utcnow() - start > print(delta.totalseconds()) > > fut = concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(maxworkers=20) > for x in range(100): > # comment the following line > fut = concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(maxworkers=20) > c = counter(fut) > c.run() > """ > > The runtime grows after each step: > 0.216451 > 0.225186 > 0.223725 > 0.222274 > 0.230964 > 0.240531 > 0.24137 > 0.252393 > 0.249948 > 0.257153 > ... > > Is there a mistake in this piece of code?
There is no mistake that I can see but I suspect that the circular references that you are building are causing the ThreadPoolExecutor to take a long time to be collected. Try adding: c = counter(fut) c.run() + fut.shutdown() Even if that fixes your problem, I still don't fully understand this because I would expect the runtime to fall after a while as ThreadPoolExecutors are collected.
The shutdown call is indeed a good fix :-) Here is the time response of the calls to counter() when shutdown is not called: http://www.freehackers.org/~tnagy/runtime_futures.png
After trying to stop the program by using CTRL+C, the following error may appear, after which the process cannot be interrupted:
""" 19🔞12 /tmp/build> python3.2 futures_test.py 0.389657 0.417173 0.416513 0.421424 0.449666 0.482273 ^CTraceback (most recent call last): File "futures_test.py", line 36, in c.run() File "futures_test.py", line 22, in run self.fut.submit(look_busy, self.count, self) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.2/concurrent/futures/thread.py", line 114, in submit self._work_queue.put(w) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.2/queue.py", line 135, in put self.not_full.acquire() KeyboardInterrupt """
It is not expected, is it?
Thomas
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
- Next message: [Python-Dev] futures API
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]