[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87445 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/numbers.py (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Dec 24 02:08:08 CET 2010
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87458 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/gettext.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87445 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/numbers.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 4:41 AM, eric.araujo <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
Author: eric.araujo Date: Thu Dec 23 19:41:33 2010 New Revision: 87445
Log: Fix small inaccuracy: there is no index function
Yes, there is, it just isn't a builtin - it lives in the operator module.
def index(self): - """index(self)""" + """someobject[self]""" return int(self)
Changing the docstring to say "operator.index(self)" would be the clearest solution here. (Choosing to accept arbitrary index objects as integer equivalents is up to the object being indexed, just like interpreting slices is - a dict, for example, will never invoke index methods).
Cheers, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87458 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/gettext.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r87445 - python/branches/py3k/Lib/numbers.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]